Going East: was the Shift in Volume Shipbuilding Capacity from Britain and Continental Europe to the Far East and Elsewhere during the Latter Half of the Twentieth-Century Inevitable?

By Daniel Todd, published February 2011


Credit: NMM G10550

British shipbuilding had by the early twentieth century risen to world dominance as a result of the economic advantages of cluster development. The close ties established between yards and their suppliers through proximate locations produced economic effectiveness. Fatal flaws emerged in the latter twentieth century, in the form of labour problems, congestion costs and managerial inertia. The benefits of clusters disintegrated and precipitated the decline of British shipbuilders, followed by European yards, in favour of large yards located in the Far East with scant regard for cluster considerations, but enjoying more competitive labour costs that could be exploited through the standardisation of process technology.

Join Today To Read The Full Article

Filed under: Atlantic | Other (Twentieth C) | Pacific
Subjects include: Harbours & Dockyards | Shipbuilding & Design

Join Today To Read The Full Article

Join Now

If you are already a member please login here.